> > Jordan should have to say something about this. AFAIR, bumps are
> > allowed but only by one between releases. We will have to provide
> > libc_r.so.3 in /usr/lib/compat/compat3x, though (we'll have to do this
> > anyway by the time 4.x is released).
>
> I'd prefer not to bump it... John Birrell and I are already not
> entirely in agreement that the change required a version bump at
> all. It didn't change any interfaces.
I don't care one way or the other. I could leave out the wrapped
poll() very easily and avoid the issue all together. This would
provide -stable with everything -current has, except of course
poll(). I'd prefer to add poll, though...
If you don't bump the version in -stable, then you could end up
with two versions of libc_r that are not different (assuming -current
doesn't make any subsequent changes that warrant a version bump).
Just tell me what to do, and I'll do it :-)
Dan Eischen
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
