> I don't care one way or the other. I could leave out the wrapped > poll() very easily and avoid the issue all together. This would > provide -stable with everything -current has, except of course > poll(). I'd prefer to add poll, though... I'm OK with adding poll(), it just seemed odd that the version number bumped with no API interface changes taking place. Handle it however you best see fit. :) - Jordan To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
- Re: seg fault in mutex_queue_enq Kip Macy
- new seg fault in thread code Kip Macy
- Re: seg fault in mutex_queue_enq Thomas Gellekum
- Re: seg fault in mutex_queue_enq Daniel Eischen
- Re: seg fault in mutex_queue_enq Daniel Eischen
- Re: seg fault in mutex_queue_enq Thomas Gellekum
- Re: seg fault in mutex_queue_enq Thomas Gellekum
- Re: seg fault in mutex_queue_enq Jordan K. Hubbard
- Re: seg fault in mutex_queue_enq Mike Meyer
- Re: seg fault in mutex_queue_enq Daniel Eischen
- Re: seg fault in mutex_queue_enq Jordan K. Hubbard
- Re: seg fault in mutex_queue_enq Thomas Gellekum

