If it will get ALL of you to give it a rest, how about:
per-rule logging limits
logging limit raising
logging limit resetting
Which would all NOT affect the statistics?
I am, yes, suggesting I will implement it.
Brian Fundakowski Feldman _ __ ___ ____ ___ ___ ___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ __ ___ | _ ) __| \
FreeBSD: The Power to Serve! _ __ | _ \._ \ |) |
http://www.FreeBSD.org/ _ |___/___/___/
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
- Re: securelevel and ipfw zero Joe Greco
- Re: securelevel and ipfw zero Nate Williams
- Re: securelevel and ipfw zero Joe Greco
- Re: securelevel and ipfw zero Nate Williams
- Re: securelevel and ipfw zero Joe Greco
- Re: securelevel and ipfw zero Nate Williams
- Re: securelevel and ipfw zero Joe Greco
- Re: securelevel and ipfw zero Achim Patzner
- Re: securelevel and ipfw zero Julian Elischer
- Re: securelevel and ipfw zero Henk van Oers
- Re: securelevel and ipfw zero Brian F. Feldman
- Re: securelevel and ipfw zero Nate Williams
- Re: securelevel and ipfw zero Brian F. Feldman
- Re: securelevel and ipfw zero Henk van Oers
- Re: securelevel and ipfw zero Nate Williams
- Re: securelevel and ipfw zero Nate Williams
- Re: securelevel and ipfw zero Brian F. Feldman
- Re: securelevel and ipfw zero Nate Williams
- Re: securelevel and ipfw zero Brian F. Feldman
- Re: securelevel and ipfw zero Nate Williams
- Re: securelevel and ipfw zero Brian F. Feldman

