> > Implementing it is the easy part, making sure it's the right thing to do > > is the hard part. > > Well, the easy part is done, except for raising limits. Look: > ipfw: 1 Deny ICMP:8.0 127.0.0.1 127.0.0.1 out via lo0 > ipfw: 1 Deny ICMP:8.0 127.0.0.1 127.0.0.1 out via lo0 > ipfw: limit 2 reached on rule #1 > ipfw: Entry 1 logging count reset. > ipfw: 1 Deny ICMP:8.0 127.0.0.1 127.0.0.1 out via lo0 > ipfw: 1 Deny ICMP:8.0 127.0.0.1 127.0.0.1 out via lo0 > ipfw: limit 2 reached on rule #1 > > Nice? :) Depends on how it effects the speed of the system and if it makes the code too complex. :) Nate To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
- Re: securelevel and ipfw zero Nate Williams
- Re: securelevel and ipfw zero Joe Greco
- Re: securelevel and ipfw zero Achim Patzner
- Re: securelevel and ipfw zero Julian Elischer
- Re: securelevel and ipfw zero Henk van Oers
- Re: securelevel and ipfw zero Brian F. Feldman
- Re: securelevel and ipfw zero Nate Williams
- Re: securelevel and ipfw zero Brian F. Feldman
- Re: securelevel and ipfw zero Henk van Oers
- Re: securelevel and ipfw zero Nate Williams
- Re: securelevel and ipfw zero Nate Williams
- Re: securelevel and ipfw zero Brian F. Feldman
- Re: securelevel and ipfw zero Nate Williams
- Re: securelevel and ipfw zero Brian F. Feldman
- Re: securelevel and ipfw zero Nate Williams
- Re: securelevel and ipfw zero Brian F. Feldman
- Re: securelevel and ipfw zero Nate Williams
- Re: securelevel and ipfw zero Brian F. Feldman
- Re: securelevel and ipfw zero Nate Williams
- Re: securelevel and ipfw zero Brian F. Feldman
- Re: securelevel and ipfw zero Nate Williams

