> This is a clear security vs functionality issue and I need to get a > good feel for which "cause" is ascendent here in knowing which way to > jump on the matter. Can we now hear the closing arguments from the > pro and con folks? I thought we decided that the networking gurus we're going to make it possible to send out broadcast packets on an unconfigured interface so that DHCP would work, so that bpf wasn't required. I thought that was the over-riding reason for adding bpf to the kernel. Otherwise, BPF is mostly (completely) un-necessary for general purpose computing machines. Nate To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
- Re: So, back on the topic of enabl... Bernd Walter
- Re: So, back on the topic of e... Ben Rosengart
- Re: So, back on the topic of e... Bernd Walter
- Re: So, back on the topic of e... Bill Fumerola
- Re: So, back on the topic of e... Warner Losh
- Re: So, back on the topic of enabl... Christopher Masto
- Re: So, back on the topic of enabl... Warner Losh
- Re: So, back on the topic of enabl... Warner Losh
- Re: So, back on the topic of enabling b... Wes Peters
- Re: So, back on the topic of enabling bpf in GE... Warner Losh
- Re: So, back on the topic of enabling bpf in GENERIC... Nate Williams
- Re: So, back on the topic of enabling bpf in GENERIC... Daniel C. Sobral
- Re: So, back on the topic of enabling bpf in GENERIC... Wes Peters
- Re: So, back on the topic of enabling bpf in GENERIC... Peter Jeremy
- Re: So, back on the topic of enabling bpf in GENERIC... Mark Murray
- Re: So, back on the topic of enabling bpf in GENERI... Jordan K. Hubbard

