In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Bernd Walter writes: : Maybe a set of sysctls with a switch to off only behavour would be a : better way. Actually, a better way would be to have the interfaces to the network stack that would handle this stuff w/o needing to resort to bpf. Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
- Re: So, back on the topic of e... Wes Peters
- Re: So, back on the topic of e... Warner Losh
- Re: So, back on the topic of e... Sergey Babkin
- Re: So, back on the topic of e... Josef Karthauser
- Re: So, back on the topic of enabl... Warner Losh
- Re: So, back on the topic of e... Sergey Babkin
- Re: So, back on the topic of enabl... Bernd Walter
- Re: So, back on the topic of e... Ben Rosengart
- Re: So, back on the topic of e... Bernd Walter
- Re: So, back on the topic of e... Bill Fumerola
- Re: So, back on the topic of e... Warner Losh
- Re: So, back on the topic of enabl... Christopher Masto
- Re: So, back on the topic of enabl... Warner Losh
- Re: So, back on the topic of enabl... Warner Losh
- Re: So, back on the topic of enabling b... Wes Peters
- Re: So, back on the topic of enabling bpf in GE... Warner Losh
- Re: So, back on the topic of enabling bpf in GENERIC... Nate Williams
- Re: So, back on the topic of enabling bpf in GENERIC... Daniel C. Sobral
- Re: So, back on the topic of enabling bpf in GENERIC... Wes Peters

