Re: So, back on the topic of enabling bpf in GENERIC...

[Alfred Perlstein]

On Fri, 30 Jul 1999, Warner Losh wrote:

> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "Brian F. 
>Feldman" writes:
> : And how about having
> :     if (securelevel > 3)
> :             return (EPERM);
> : in bpf_open()?
> 
> There are no security levels > 3.  I'd be happy with > 0.  This is
> consistant with the meaning of "raw devices".

What about the one-way sysctls that have been suggested?

-Alfred



To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message