Re: So, back on the topic of enabling bpf in GENERIC...

[Warner Losh]

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Alfred Perlstein writes: 
: What about the one-way sysctls that have been suggested?

They need to be implemente dfirst.  A quick securelevel > 0 in bpf_open
would allow many people's objections to bpf in the kernel by default.

Warner



To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message