Terry Lambert wrote:
>
> Make sure that the system you are talking to over the proxy is
> not assumed to be a FreeBSD system (e.g. don't assume that the
> vfs_default stuff exists on the other end of the proxy, or that
> it would be functional).
Now, Terry, that is ridiculous. One has to assume that both ends
play by the same rules. That is not only a reasonably expectation,
it's minimum requirement for any protocol to work.
--
Daniel C. Sobral (8-DCS)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Can I speak to your superior?
- There's some religious debate on that question.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
- Re: BSD XFS Port & BSD VFS Rewrite Michael Hancock
- Re: BSD XFS Port & BSD VFS Rewrite Bill Studenmund
- Re: BSD XFS Port & BSD VFS Rewrite Michael Hancock
- Re: BSD XFS Port & BSD VFS Rewrite Terry Lambert
- Re: BSD XFS Port & BSD VFS Rewrite Poul-Henning Kamp
- Re: BSD XFS Port & BSD VFS Rewrite Terry Lambert
- Re: BSD XFS Port & BSD VFS Rewrite Poul-Henning Kamp
- Re: BSD XFS Port & BSD VFS Rewrite Terry Lambert
- Re: BSD XFS Port & BSD VFS Rewrite Poul-Henning Kamp
- Re: BSD XFS Port & BSD VFS Rewrite Terry Lambert
- Re: BSD XFS Port & BSD VFS Rewrite Daniel C. Sobral
- Re: BSD XFS Port & BSD VFS Rewrite Terry Lambert
- Re: BSD XFS Port & BSD VFS Rewrite Daniel C. Sobral
- Re: BSD XFS Port & BSD VFS Rewrite Daniel C. Sobral
- Re: BSD XFS Port & BSD VFS Rewrite Bill Studenmund
- Re: BSD XFS Port & BSD VFS Rewrite Michael Hancock
- Re: BSD XFS Port & BSD VFS Rewrite Bill Studenmund
- Re: BSD XFS Port & BSD VFS Rewrite Michael Hancock
- Re: BSD XFS Port & BSD VFS Rewrite Terry Lambert
- Re: BSD XFS Port & BSD VFS Rewrite Bill Studenmund
- Re: BSD XFS Port & BSD VFS Rewrite Terry Lambert

