On Thu, 4 Nov 1999, Arun Sharma wrote:
> I just looked at the sysctl implementation and there are some differences.
> Moreover, since it was not being used in tools like vmstat and xosview,
> I thought there must be a reason.
> 
> sysctl also seems to assume that it doesn't get called frequently. So
> mapping the name to the sysctl data is a slightly more heavy duty
> operation than a hash table lookup.

Wouldn't hashing the sysctl OIDs be the way to go then?

Why invent another namespace?

-- 
| Matthew N. Dodd  | '78 Datsun 280Z | '75 Volvo 164E | FreeBSD/NetBSD  |
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] |       2 x '84 Volvo 245DL        | ix86,sparc,pmax |
| http://www.jurai.net/~winter | This Space For Rent  | ISO8802.5 4ever |



To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message

Reply via email to