Dennis has a good point. > for slower? I've ran FreeBSD for years and now I run a combo of -STABLE > and -CURRENT and you know what? It's all good! My hardware is the bottle > neck and its just as fast as 2.x was. Do you have some numbers to back this up? (unfortunately "It's all good!" doesn't mean much to serious systems researchers). What benchmarks have you been running? chris stein To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
- PCI DMA lockups in 3.2 (3.3 maybe?) Dennis
- Re: PCI DMA lockups in 3.2 (3.3 maybe?) Mike Smith
- Re: PCI DMA lockups in 3.2 (3.3 maybe?) Dennis
- Re: PCI DMA lockups in 3.2 (3.3 maybe?) Mike Smith
- Re: PCI DMA lockups in 3.2 (3.3 maybe?) Dennis
- Re: PCI DMA lockups in 3.2 (3.3 ma... Bosko Milekic
- RE: PCI DMA lockups in 3.2 (3.... FreeBSD
- RE: PCI DMA lockups in 3.2... Christopher Stein
- RE: PCI DMA lockups in 3.2... FreeBSD
- RE: PCI DMA lockups in 3.2... Kris Kennaway
- RE: PCI DMA lockups in 3.2... Christopher Stein
- RE: PCI DMA lockups in 3.2... Kris Kennaway
- Re: PCI DMA lockups in 3.2... Mike Smith
- Re: PCI DMA lockups in 3.2... Dennis
- Re: PCI DMA lockups in 3.2... Wes Peters
- Re: PCI DMA lockups in 3.2... Dennis
- Re: PCI DMA lockups in 3.2... David Scheidt
- Re: PCI DMA lockups in 3.2... Wes Peters

