On Sun, 21 Nov 1999, Kris Kennaway wrote: > On Sun, 21 Nov 1999, Christopher Stein wrote: > > > Dennis has a good point. > > Dennis has no point unless he provides some numbers to quantify his > claim. His point was not a claim about performance, rather he was bringing into question whether performance was improving with successive releases. > > Witness: > > FreeBSD 3.X is the fastest thing I have ever seen: it's so much faster > than 2.X, I can only guess what 4.X is going to be like! > > There, now we're neutral again :-) > What do you mean by fastest? What does it do so much faster than 2.x? Fast at what? chris stein To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
- PCI DMA lockups in 3.2 (3.3 maybe?) Dennis
- Re: PCI DMA lockups in 3.2 (3.3 maybe?) Mike Smith
- Re: PCI DMA lockups in 3.2 (3.3 maybe?) Dennis
- Re: PCI DMA lockups in 3.2 (3.3 maybe?) Mike Smith
- Re: PCI DMA lockups in 3.2 (3.3 maybe?) Dennis
- Re: PCI DMA lockups in 3.2 (3.3 ma... Bosko Milekic
- RE: PCI DMA lockups in 3.2 (3.... FreeBSD
- RE: PCI DMA lockups in 3.2... Christopher Stein
- RE: PCI DMA lockups in 3.2... FreeBSD
- RE: PCI DMA lockups in 3.2... Kris Kennaway
- RE: PCI DMA lockups in 3.2... Christopher Stein
- RE: PCI DMA lockups in 3.2... Kris Kennaway
- Re: PCI DMA lockups in 3.2... Mike Smith
- Re: PCI DMA lockups in 3.2... Dennis
- Re: PCI DMA lockups in 3.2... Wes Peters
- Re: PCI DMA lockups in 3.2... Dennis
- Re: PCI DMA lockups in 3.2... David Scheidt
- Re: PCI DMA lockups in 3.2... Wes Peters
- Re: PCI DMA lockups in 3.2... Jordan K. Hubbard
- Re: PCI DMA lockups in 3.2... Matthew Dillon
- Re: PCI DMA lockups in 3.2... Wes Peters

