On Mon, 6 Dec 1999, Dennis wrote:
> Of course moving to -current to fix the problems in 3.x introduce a whole
> new set of problems, in which case you have an OS that is never going to be
> stable. When 4.0 is released we'll be told that the problems of 4.0 are
> fixed in -current. When does it end?
A rose by any other name....
4.0 will soon be 4.0-{RELEASE,STABLE} will it be okay for you to use then?
When does it end? Hopefully never.
--
- bill fumerola - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - BF1560 - computer horizons corp -
- ph:(800) 252-2421 - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
- Re: PCI DMA lockups in 3.2 (3.3 maybe?) Matthew Dillon
- Re: PCI DMA lockups in 3.2 (3.3 maybe?) Jordan K. Hubbard
- Re: PCI DMA lockups in 3.2 (3.3 maybe?) Matthew Dillon
- Re: PCI DMA lockups in 3.2 (3.3 maybe?) Jordan K. Hubbard
- Re: PCI DMA lockups in 3.2 (3.3 maybe?) Matthew Dillon
- Re: PCI DMA lockups in 3.2 (3.3 maybe?) Eivind Eklund
- Re: PCI DMA lockups in 3.2 (3.3 maybe?) Ben Rosengart
- Re: PCI DMA lockups in 3.2 (3.3 maybe?) Karl Denninger
- Re: PCI DMA lockups in 3.2 (3.3 maybe?) Matthew Dillon
- Re: PCI DMA lockups in 3.2 (3.3 maybe?) Karl Denninger
- Re: PCI DMA lockups in 3.2 (3.3 maybe?) Bill Fumerola
- Re: PCI DMA lockups in 3.2 (3.3 maybe?) Mike Smith
- Re: PCI DMA lockups in 3.2 (3.3 maybe?) Matthew Dillon
- Re: PCI DMA lockups in 3.2 (3.3 maybe?) Mike Smith
- Re: PCI DMA lockups in 3.2 (3.3 maybe?) Matthew Dillon
- Re: PCI DMA lockups in 3.2 (3.3 maybe?) Jordan K. Hubbard
- Re: PCI DMA lockups in 3.2 (3.3 maybe?) Ben Rosengart
- Re: PCI DMA lockups in 3.2 (3.3 maybe?) Warner Losh
- Re: PCI DMA lockups in 3.2 (3.3 maybe?) Mike Smith
- Re: PCI DMA lockups in 3.2 (3.3 maybe?) Dennis
- Re: PCI DMA lockups in 3.2 (3.3 maybe?) Wes Peters

