> In otherwords, we should branch with the 4.1 release rather then the > 4.0 release. Sounds a lot like 3.x to me. We didn't branch at 3.0 either, we branched one release afterwards and only after people threatened to mutiny if we didn't since the usual pattern up to that point had been to branch immmediate at the dot-zero. It didn't seem to help, as your own complaints would indicate. - Jordan To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
- Re: PCI DMA lockups in 3.2 (3.3 maybe?) Doug Rabson
- Re: PCI DMA lockups in 3.2 (3.3 maybe?) Gerard Roudier
- Re: PCI DMA lockups in 3.2 (3.3 maybe?) Peter Wemm
- Re: PCI DMA lockups in 3.2 (3.3 maybe?) Pat Lynch
- Re: PCI DMA lockups in 3.2 (3.3 maybe?) Jordan K. Hubbard
- Re: PCI DMA lockups in 3.2 (3.3 maybe?) Matthew Dillon
- Re: PCI DMA lockups in 3.2 (3.3 maybe?) Dennis
- Re: PCI DMA lockups in 3.2 (3.3 maybe?) Matthew Dillon
- Re: PCI DMA lockups in 3.2 (3.3 maybe?) Jordan K. Hubbard
- Re: PCI DMA lockups in 3.2 (3.3 maybe?) Matthew Dillon
- Re: PCI DMA lockups in 3.2 (3.3 maybe?) Jordan K. Hubbard
- Re: PCI DMA lockups in 3.2 (3.3 maybe?) Matthew Dillon
- Re: PCI DMA lockups in 3.2 (3.3 maybe?) Eivind Eklund
- Re: PCI DMA lockups in 3.2 (3.3 maybe?) Ben Rosengart
- Re: PCI DMA lockups in 3.2 (3.3 maybe?) Karl Denninger
- Re: PCI DMA lockups in 3.2 (3.3 maybe?) Matthew Dillon
- Re: PCI DMA lockups in 3.2 (3.3 maybe?) Karl Denninger
- Re: PCI DMA lockups in 3.2 (3.3 maybe?) Bill Fumerola
- Re: PCI DMA lockups in 3.2 (3.3 maybe?) Mike Smith
- Re: PCI DMA lockups in 3.2 (3.3 maybe?) Matthew Dillon
- Re: PCI DMA lockups in 3.2 (3.3 maybe?) Mike Smith