On 05-Jan-00 Dan Nelson wrote: > Aah, but we wouldn't have found the bug if FreeBSD hadn't caught it > I prefer to trap by default. The very few programs that require > IEEE > conformance can call fpsetmask() themselves. Isn't it really a POLA issue? It affects people that port code because if the way FreeBSD works is non standard you have to patch... ie for just about any Linux app which does FPU stuff :) --- Daniel O'Connor software and network engineer for Genesis Software - http://www.gsoft.com.au "The nice thing about standards is that there are so many of them to choose from." -- Andrew Tanenbaum To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
- Re: Should -mieee-fp equal fpsetmask(... Ronald F. Guilmette
- Re: Should -mieee-fp equal fpset... Thomas David Rivers
- Re: Should -mieee-fp equal f... Ronald F. Guilmette
- Re: Should -mieee-fp equal fpset... Martin Cracauer
- Re: Should -mieee-fp equal f... Ronald F. Guilmette
- Re: Should -mieee-fp equal fpsetmask(... Markus Holmberg
- Re: Should -mieee-fp equal fpset... Martin Cracauer
- Re: Should -mieee-fp equal fpsetmask(... Markus Holmberg
- Re: Should -mieee-fp equal fpset... Ronald F. Guilmette
- Re: Should -mieee-fp equal f... Dan Nelson
- Re: Should -mieee-fp equal f... Daniel O'Connor
- Re: Should -mieee-fp equal fpsetmask(0) to av... Martin Cracauer
- Re: Should -mieee-fp equal fpsetmask(0) t... Ronald F. Guilmette
- Re: Should -mieee-fp equal fpsetmask(0) to avoid SIGFP... Ronald F. Guilmette
- Re: Should -mieee-fp equal fpsetmask(0) to avoid ... Tim Vanderhoek

