> > > On Wed, 15 Mar 2000 14:43:27 GMT, Paul Robinson wrote: > > > If you save 20Mb, over a reliable 56Kb modem, you've saved them somewhere > > in the region of one and a half hours... I think you guys are too used to > > your broadband... :) > > And you're forgetting that, as I said in my original reply, people with > 56K modems usually benefit from hardware compression over their link > anyway. > Har har. I have 33.6... compression? Har har. Better than gzip? :) But I *don't* need downloading 600Mb (jeee!)... Usualy there are ISPs who download such things and then sell some CDs (just the media:)). And they don't give a shXt about 20MB more or less... To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
- Re: Why not gzip iso images? Sheldon Hearn
- Re: Why not gzip iso images? Luigi Rizzo
- Re: Why not gzip iso images? Alfred Perlstein
- Re: Why not gzip iso images? Paul Robinson
- Re: Why not gzip iso images... Sheldon Hearn
- Re: Why not gzip iso i... Paul Robinson
- Re: Why not gzip i... Sheldon Hearn
- Re: Why not gzip i... Paul Robinson
- Re: Why not gzip i... Patryk Zadarnowski
- Re: Why not gzip iso i... Ruslan Ermilov
- Re: Why not gzip iso i... Victor Ivanov
- Re: Why not gzip iso images... Alfred Perlstein
- Re: Why not gzip iso i... andrew
- Re: Why not gzip i... Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven
- Re: Why not gzip i... Jordan K. Hubbard
- That's why [Re: Why no... Victor Ivanov
- Re: Why not gzip iso images... Peter Edwards
- Re: Why not gzip iso images... Daniel C. Sobral
- Re: Why not gzip iso images? Donn Miller
- RE: Why not gzip iso images? Wood, Richard

