On Jul 16, 2011, at 5:42 PM, Hiroki Sato wrote: > Vlad Galu <[email protected]> wrote > in <[email protected]>: > > du> Hello, > du> > du> A couple of years ago, Stef Walter proposed a patch[1] that enforced > du> the scope of routing messages. The general consesus was that the best > du> approach would be the OpenBSD way - transporting the FIB number in the > du> message and letting the user applications filter out unwanted > du> messages. > du> > du> Are there any plans to tackle this before 9.0? > > I am looking into this and investigating other possible extensions in > rtsock messages such as addition of a fib member to rt_msghdr. I am > not sure it can be done before 9.0, though... > > -- Hiroki
Thanks! Even if this gets postponed for 10.0, living with a backport of the official implementation would be easier than maintaining a homegrown solution. VG _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
