David Preece writes: > Possibly off topic, possibly not. Am I the only one who doesn't really care > about uptimes? I certainly am not impressed by uptimes over about 100 days. They show that the site does not care about keeping current. If it made sense to have several hundred days of uptime, what is the point of all the development work done by the FreeBSD (and other OS) developers? These people work hard to improve the system and it makes sense to at least run the latest production release. In the case of FreeBSD, this means a reboot at least every three to four months when the CDs are released. -- Greg Black <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
- Re: FreeBSD in good standing in netcraft survey Peter
- Re: FreeBSD in good standing in netcraft survey Poul-Henning Kamp
- Re: FreeBSD in good standing in netcraft surve... Anders Nordby
- Re: FreeBSD in good standing in netcraft s... Poul-Henning Kamp
- Re: FreeBSD in good standing in netcraft survey Jamie Heckford
- Re: FreeBSD in good standing in netcraft surve... Jeremiah Gowdy
- Re: FreeBSD in good standing in netcraft surve... Peter
- Re: FreeBSD in good standing in netcraft s... Eric Melville
- Re: FreeBSD in good standing in netcraft s... Frederik Meerwaldt
- Re: FreeBSD in good standing in netcra... David Preece
- Re: FreeBSD in good standing in n... Greg Black
- Re: FreeBSD in good standing ... Wes Peters
- Re: FreeBSD in good standing in n... Kris Kennaway
- Re: FreeBSD in good standing ... Terry Lambert
- Re: FreeBSD in good standing ... Michael C . Wu
- Re: FreeBSD in good standing in netcraft survey Jonathan Perkin
- Re: FreeBSD in good standing in netcraft survey Laurence Berland
- Re: FreeBSD in good standing in netcraft survey Joe Greco
- Re: FreeBSD in good standing in netcraft survey Roger Marquis
- Re: FreeBSD in good standing in netcraft survey Alfred Perlstein
- Re: FreeBSD in good standing in netcraft survey Roger Marquis

