On 3 September 2012 12:01, <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, Sep 3, 2012 at 7:29 AM, Eitan Adler <[email protected]> wrote: >> On 3 September 2012 10:19, Ryan Stone <[email protected]> wrote: >>> On Sun, Sep 2, 2012 at 5:45 PM, Eitan Adler <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> Why isn't git.freebsd.org a straight "git svn clone" ? AFAIK that isn't >>>> broken. >>> >>> Well, let's put it this way: I started a git svn clone of the src >>> repository on Aug 28. It's still going. And I'm only creating a very >>> small subset of the branches in the repo. >> >> I've done the same and it only took me a few hours although the ports >> repo took a few days. > > Did you try to preserve the full history in the git version? I'm not > familiar with git clone, but when I've made a git copy of an svn repo > for uses at work (both of freebsd.org any $WORK's repo) it took two to > three days just to fetch the portion of the revisions that were for > head/current. > > A few hours sounds too short. The three-four days since Aug 28 sounds > normal to me.
I have the complete history of HEAD from revision r1 to r240065. I don't have other branches. -- Eitan Adler _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
