On 3 September 2012 12:09, Eitan Adler <[email protected]> wrote: > On 3 September 2012 12:01, <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Mon, Sep 3, 2012 at 7:29 AM, Eitan Adler <[email protected]> wrote: >>> On 3 September 2012 10:19, Ryan Stone <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> On Sun, Sep 2, 2012 at 5:45 PM, Eitan Adler <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> Why isn't git.freebsd.org a straight "git svn clone" ? AFAIK that isn't >>>>> broken. >>>> >>>> Well, let's put it this way: I started a git svn clone of the src >>>> repository on Aug 28. It's still going. And I'm only creating a very >>>> small subset of the branches in the repo. >>> >>> I've done the same and it only took me a few hours although the ports >>> repo took a few days. >> >> Did you try to preserve the full history in the git version? I'm not >> familiar with git clone, but when I've made a git copy of an svn repo >> for uses at work (both of freebsd.org any $WORK's repo) it took two to >> three days just to fetch the portion of the revisions that were for >> head/current. >> >> A few hours sounds too short. The three-four days since Aug 28 sounds >> normal to me. > > I have the complete history of HEAD from revision r1 to r240065. I > don't have other branches.
another thought: even if it does take this long, it should be a one time conversion cost. cloning the repo should not take that long, and a "git svn rebase" on a cron job shouldn't take that long either. -- Eitan Adler _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
