On Mon, Dec 11, 2000 at 11:36:22AM -0700, Warner Losh wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Nicolas Souchu writes:
> : On Fri, Dec 08, 2000 at 11:13:12PM -0700, Warner Losh wrote:
> : >
> : > OK. I have a partial start on the serial/parallel cards. It isn't
> : > attaching anything yet, but should give people an idea on the
> : > direction I'd like to head.
> : >
> : > As part of this work, I'll likely remove pci attachment of sio, and
> : > change it to puc. puc is the name NetBSD uses (I snagged the tables
> : > and some code from NetBSD's puc driver, btw) so I kept using it. I'll
> : > also need to add puc attachments to sio and ppc drivers.
> :
> : What will actually happened to them, especially ppc? Currently, ppc is
> : isa dependent so why should we change the DRIVER_MODULE directive to
> : attach to puc?
>
> I'd make ppc less isa specific, but it isn't that hard to do from
You must think of moving the microseq interpretation in an other file.
> looking at the code. I'd also think about moving it to dev/ppc with a
> ppc_isa.c and ppc_puc.c.
This is something I don't understand. If ppc_puc is a PCI driver why don't
you put in the pci directory and let ppc_isa in isa one?
Nicholas
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Alc�ve - Open Source Software Engineer - http://www.alcove.fr
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
