On Tue, Dec 12, 2000 at 10:07:07AM -0700, Warner Losh wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Nicolas Souchu writes:
> : > looking at the code. I'd also think about moving it to dev/ppc with a
> : > ppc_isa.c and ppc_puc.c.
> :
> : This is something I don't understand. If ppc_puc is a PCI driver why don't
> : you put in the pci directory and let ppc_isa in isa one?
>
> Because in FreeBSD you put all the files for a driver in one
> directory. In NetBSD you'd do things the way you are talking about.
> sio and ppc break this rule right now.
I'm sure that this subject has been discussion many times on the lists.
I'm also sure that there's a good reason for this, otherwise it wouldn't be
your choice (you is the team). But as it is the opposite of my personal
feeling, could you give me one reason for this in few words?
Is it for maintainance purpose, so you can remove the whole driver if
not anymore supported for example? NetBSD is architecture independent
oriented, so I guess their choice is also good from there point of view...
Nicholas
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Alc�ve - Open Source Software Engineer - http://www.alcove.fr
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
