On Mon, Dec 18, 2000 at 03:12:35PM -0600, Michael C . Wu wrote:
> I would be quite interested. But do we have the resouces and the man-hours
> to handle IA-64/KA-64/PPC/Alpha/StrongARM at the same time?
Agreed.
> Perhaps the first step would be to start a [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> mailing list?
Then why start Yet Another(tm) mailing list for it as everyone has agreed
it isn't time for that yet.
> However, imho we should finish the FreeBSD/PPC project first.
> The StrongARM is quite similiar to the PPC processors. If we
> get the loader and init working, the rest will be a breeze.
The loader would be very different from PowerPC for any StrongARM
development platform I'm aware of -- DNARD and CATS.
Uh... you certainly seem to have forgotten about locore.s and pmap
modules. They are not "a breeze".
> We could simply build a cross-gcc on ARM/Linux and the rest is
> making sure that everything compiles.
How about concentrating effort on just _one_ new platform (ok, two --
ia64 and powerpc)???
> The good thing is that we do not need SMP on FreeBSD/ARM/StrongARM.
> (PowerPC still needs SMP support though.)
Yes and no. Depend ons what you're doing with the powerpc -- remember
the most interest for FreeBSD/PowerPC to date has been embedded products
and comm processors. They don't tend to be SMP boards. I really don't
see running on Mac G3/4 as the driving reason -- that machine is just the
reference and development platform.
--
-- David ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
GNU is Not Unix / Linux Is Not UniX
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
