> At 12:50 PM 03/25/2001, Matthew Jacob wrote: > >On Sat, 24 Mar 2001, Dennis wrote: > > > > > > > > If the if_wx driver sucks, why not fix it rather than trying to coerce a > > > mega-companies with a deep political structure to change is policies? > > > But if youre not going to maintain it, dont do it at all. You cant > > stick it to > > > users by deciding later that you dont want to support it anymore. > > > >I am going to fix it (but this has been low on my priority list- you got the > >bucks to pay for this, buddy, &and& make it more attractive then the other > >things I'm currently getting paid to work on? money talks...), and I *also* am > >trying to change Intel's policy. > > If I pay for it, I own it. Thats the caveat of "open-source" Not necessarily. You might pay to have it developed. To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
- Re: Intel driver doc's Take 2. Dan Langille
- Re: Intel driver doc's Take 2. Dennis
- Re: Intel driver doc's Take 2. Matthew Jacob
- Re: Intel driver doc's Take 2. Dan Langille
- Re: Intel driver doc's Take 2. Dennis
- Re: Intel driver doc's Take 2. Will Andrews
- Re: Intel driver doc's Take 2. Dennis
- Re: Intel driver doc's Take 2. David O'Brien
- old business (was Re: Intel drive... Matthew Jacob
- Re: old business (was Re: Intel d... Dennis
- Re: Intel driver doc's Take 2. Matthew Jacob
- Re: Intel driver doc's Take 2. David O'Brien
- Re: Intel driver doc's Take 2. Peter Wemm
- Re: Intel driver doc's Take 2. Wes Peters
- Re: Intel driver doc's Take 2. Matthew Jacob
- Re: Intel driver doc's Take 2. Matthew Jacob
- Re: Intel driver doc's Take 2. Matthew Jacob
- Re: Intel driver doc's Take 2. Jonathan Lemon
- Re: Intel driver doc's Take 2. Matthew Jacob
- Re: Intel driver doc's Take 2. Jonathan Lemon
- Re: Intel driver doc's Take 2. Sergey Babkin

