On Sun, Apr 01, 2001 at 10:55:23AM +1000, Greg Black wrote: > Many years ago I implemented a new interface that I called > eaccess() which replicated the work of access, but tested > against the effective uid and gid. I'd like to see that > introduced more widely. That still isn't suffient (and even more scary) unless the parameter is a file handle or FILE pointer. We need an faccess() call, plain and simple. -- -- David ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
- Re: Security problems with access(2)? Jordan DeLong
- Re: Security problems with access(... Mike Smith
- Re: Security problems with access(... Jordan DeLong
- Re: Security problems with access(... Mike Smith
- Re: Security problems with access(2)? ... Bill Moran
- Re: Security problems with access(... Mike Smith
- Re: Security problems with access(... Bill Moran
- Re: Security problems with access(... Greg Black
- Re: Security problems with access(2)? Robert Watson
- Re: Security problems with access(... Greg Black
- Re: Security problems with access(... David O'Brien
- Re: Security problems with access(... Robert Watson
- Re: Security problems with access(... Greg Black
- Re: Security problems with access(... David O'Brien
- Re: Security problems with access(... Greg Black
- Re: Security problems with access(... Robert Watson
- Re: Security problems with access(... Warner Losh
- Re: Security problems with access(2)? Warner Losh
- Re: Security problems with access(2)? David Malone
- Re: Security problems with access(2)? Warner Losh
- Re: Security problems with access(2)? Warner Losh

