"David O'Brien" wrote:
| On Sun, Apr 01, 2001 at 11:02:11PM -0400, Robert Watson wrote:
| > eaccess_file(2) - Using effective credentials, check to see if the
| > requested access is permitted on the file or directory identified by the
| > provided pathname.
|
| Why not stick to existing naming practices?
| eaccess()
|
| > eaccess_fd(2) - Using effective credentials, check to see if the
| > requested access is permitted on the file or directory associated with
| > the provided open file descriptor.
|
| Nope, faccess(2) (see fstat(2), flock(2), fchdir(2),...)
| and feaccess(2)
|
| > faccess(3) - Using effective credentials, check to see if the requested
| > access is permitted on the file or directory associated with the
| > provided open file stream.
|
| What's wrong with faccess(fileno(...)) and feaccess(fileno(...))?
My earlier agreement was with the concept; I do agree that this
is a better naming scheme.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
