Howdy,
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jacques A. Vidrine [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, 30 May 2001 7:32
> To: Chris Knight
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: nsswitch progress
>
>
> On Wed, May 30, 2001 at 06:54:10AM +1000, Chris Knight wrote:
> > If someone with commit privs is interested, I have a set of patches
> > based on the 4.1-STABLE patches that apply cleanly to 4.3. This
> > should be slightly quicker to merge with -STABLE.
>
> Are these patches equivalent to the functionality in -CURRENT (i.e.
> straight port of the NetBSD code: files, NIS, Hesiod only)?
>
> Or are they based on what is found on my web page today (i.e.
> prototype with dynamic linking, reentrant interfaces, nss_ldap
> support)?
>
The patches are based on what's found on your Web page.
> If the former, I wouldn't mind if they were committed if the rest of
> the world wants it.
>
> If the latter, that should not be committed to -STABLE under any
> circumstances, and probably not to -CURRENT either (else I would have
> done it, instead of putting it off until I could complete the work).
>
Understood. I didn't realise that the code already committed to -CURRENT
differs from that found on your Web page. My mistake. Apologies to everyone
for the misunderstanding.
> Cheers,
> --
> Jacques Vidrine / [EMAIL PROTECTED] / [EMAIL PROTECTED] /
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
Regards,
Chris Knight
Systems Administrator
AIMS Independent Computer Professionals
Tel: +61 3 6334 6664 Fax: +61 3 6331 7032 Mob: +61 419 528 795
Web: http://www.aims.com.au
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
