In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> John Baldwin writes: : Of course, this begs the question of why you are free'ing a const. :) Sometimes that's the only handle that you have on the object :-). I sometimes think that changing free to be const void * is the right answer, but that has its own set problems :-) Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
- free() and const warnings Peter Pentchev
- Re: free() and const warnings Peter Pentchev
- Re: free() and const warnings John Baldwin
- Re: free() and const warnings Jacques A. Vidrine
- Re: free() and const warnings Damien Neil
- Re: free() and const warnings Jacques A. Vidrine
- Re: free() and const warnings Warner Losh
- Re: free() and const warnings Peter Pentchev
- Re: free() and const warnings Thomas David Rivers
- Re: free() and const warnings Peter Pentchev
- Re: free() and const warning... Thomas David Rivers
- Re: free() and const war... Peter Pentchev
- Re: free() and const war... Thomas David Rivers
- Re: free() and const war... T. William Wells
- Re: free() and const warning... Assar Westerlund
- Re: free() and const war... Peter Pentchev
- Re: free() and const war... Assar Westerlund

