> The concept that "netgraph hooks" are a "leg up" on say, ETs drivers that > have integrated bandwidth management and prioritization, WAN bridging > support, load balancing and a probably 25% performance advantage is a bit > entertaining. Unless you need to do some convoluted encapsulation netgraph > is, aside from being appallingly non-standard to anything else in the market, > not much of an "advantage", and its a poster child for the trade off of > "flexibility" versus performance. > > Lets face it. If you were going to sit down and design an interface for frame > relay, multi-protocol support, etc, you'd have to be smoking something pretty > strong to come up with netgraph. But its free and there is source, so it > must be great!
Dennis, if you are going to continue trolling FreeBSD mailing lists from your AOL account, you should really consider choosing a name that does not coincide with what we already know or can easily find out about you. To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
