* Eric Melville <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [011129 13:59] wrote:
> > The concept that "netgraph hooks" are a "leg up" on say, ETs drivers that
> > have integrated bandwidth management and prioritization, WAN bridging
> > support, load balancing and a probably 25% performance advantage is a bit
> > entertaining. Unless you need to do some convoluted encapsulation netgraph
> > is, aside from being appallingly non-standard to anything else in the market,
> > not much of an "advantage", and its a poster child for the trade off of
> > "flexibility" versus performance.
> >
> > Lets face it. If you were going to sit down and design an interface for frame
> > relay, multi-protocol support, etc, you'd have to be smoking something pretty
> > strong to come up with netgraph. But its free and there is source, so it
> > must be great!
>
> Dennis, if you are going to continue trolling FreeBSD mailing lists from
> your AOL account, you should really consider choosing a name that does not
> coincide with what we already know or can easily find out about you.
Just for historical reasons I have a question...
Is Dennis and Elder Troll or was he cast of the fire and brimstone
of the BSDi dissolution?
--
-Alfred Perlstein [[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
'Instead of asking why a piece of software is using "1970s technology,"
start asking why software is ignoring 30 years of accumulated wisdom.'
http://www.morons.org/rants/gpl-harmful.php3
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
