Terry Lambert wrote: > > Maxim Sobolev wrote: > > That would be nice, but we have a real problem at hand. As I said, I > > think that ld(1) should be smart enough to reorder libc/libc_r so that > > libc_r is always linked before libc. This is clearly not the case > > right now. Unfortunately there is no easy way to reproduce this, but > > if you have some spare CPU cycles try to remore explicit -pthread from > > ports/mail/evolution/Makefile, build the port on -current and do `ldd > > /usr/X11R6/bin/evolution'. You will see that libc.so.X precedes > > libc_r.so.X, even though -lc wasn't supplied to a linker, while -lc_r > > was. > > You aren't including the linker lines for the libraries > specified before the -lc_r (which may themselves be linked > against libc.so instead of libc_r.so, which is wrong), > and you aren't including the final link line. > > See the recent patch to ldd to make it work against .so > libraries (unfortunately, it's only in -current, not yet > in -stable).
Heh, actually I'm an author of that patch. :))) -Maxim To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
