On Fri, Feb 08, 2002 at 07:06:09AM -0800, Terry Lambert wrote: > Maxim Sobolev wrote: > > No, I meant ld(1). The problem here is that in the case when libc is > > recorded before libc_r in dynamic dependencies list the resulting > > executable may not work correctly (see my testcase). > > Patient: "Doctor, it hurts when I record libc before libc_r > in the dynamic dependencies list!" > > Doctor: [expected response] > > 8-). > > Seriously, the "Evolution" build process is seriously > broken; it works on Linux because Linux has a simple > threads implementation, rather than an efficient one. > Doctor's Assistant: "No library should ever have an explicit dependency on libc".
Cheers, -- Ruslan Ermilov Sysadmin and DBA, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sunbay Software AG, [EMAIL PROTECTED] FreeBSD committer, +380.652.512.251 Simferopol, Ukraine http://www.FreeBSD.org The Power To Serve http://www.oracle.com Enabling The Information Age To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
