> I do agree that when the extra features of C++ are used this often > results in bloated programs but this can at least in part be blamed on > insufficiently skilled programmers. > > > Note that C++ is not really an OO language. It is probably better to > call it a language with support for object-oriented programming (as > well as support for other programming styles.) > I'll agree to that... :-D It's basically what I've been trying to say. That and if he's using gcc to compile, he might not get completely un-buggy code when he compiles c++ apps.
Ken To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
