Doug Barton wrote:
> > Then use Dillon's patches, instead of just turning it off.
> 
> Dillon's patches were committed, by Dillon. :) My systems still work
> better with newreno off than with it on.
> 
> > Your anecdotal experience with "works better" is just that -- anecdotal.
> > It doesn't hold for the general case.
> 
> I never claimed otherwise. In fact, I specifically suggested that this
> would be _one_ place to start testing.


The whole thread from which the quoted message was taken is
relevent.

I give up.  Turn of NewReno.  At the very least, it means
that under congestion in any segment, I won't have to worry
about your packets being able to reach my segment.  8^p.

-- Terry

To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message

Reply via email to