Sat, May 31, 2003 at 11:19:06, des (Dag-Erling Smorgrav) wrote about "Re: gcc bug? Openoffice port impossibel to compile on 4.8":
>> Essential words are understriked. I can't imagine how it can be read >> as "unsupported". DES> I didn't use the word "unsupported", I said "deprecated". Yes. But your message was reply to Wes Peters' one with the following: wp> Funny, the last time I looked at a C language specification they were wp> still supported. Your citation says they are supported, in spite of any deprecation. -netch- _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
