On Thu, Jun 19, 2003 at 02:26:13PM -0400, The Anarcat wrote: > It's right now to the point I wouldn't consider writing more code for > libh, but I'd reuse the ideas in a smaller, plugin-based, swig-foobar > rewrite.
I went back and re-read the notes on the website about libh's design yesterday, first time in a while. It has some good ideas. Definitely lots to pick up on. > So yes, libh is kinda bad, for me at least. And it involves a lot of > C++ magic I don't really like. *shudders*. I was sorting out my flat last night getting ready to move, and I found my old undergrad copy of the second edition K&R book. I hugged it. C++ is for girls. :-) > But, as always, if someone feels like picking the horse (wether it's > alive or dead I'm never too sure), feel free! The code is there for > anyone who dares to look. I've also put up a doxygen framework and > there's a bit of design doc, so no, libh's still no so bad since so > much people put so much time in it during its long existence. Cool. > I apologize again for being so brutal to this project which had so > high hopes and also to all the people who worked on it. It's understandable. Think of it this way - at least the next-gen installer is now likely to get a better name, whoever it is that writes it. :-) -- Paul Robinson _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"