On Fri, 16 May 2008 12:01:50 -0700
Mark Foster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Mike Meyer wrote:
> > What makes you think dnsmasq doesn't cache? The documentation says
> > otherwise (second paragraph of the man page):
> >
> > Dnsmasq accepts DNS queries and either answers them from a
> > small,
> > local, cache or forwards them to a real, recursive, DNS server.
> > It
> >
> > it has quite a few options to control caching behavior, and certainly
> > seems to cache for me.
> >
> >
> Thanks for pointing out my error.
> I have no problem using dnsmasq if that is the best recommendation, in
> fact I quite like it but am not fond of djbdns.
I wanted a cooperating dhcp & dns server, and having them in one
package is to big a win to ignore.
> However lwresd *is* in the base install vs. dnsmasq which is a port, so
> would like to use lwresd if possible (or something else in base like
> cached). There is nothing I find in the man page, handbook or google
> that says I shouldn't or can't use lwresd, only hints that I can, yet
> with no clear working real-world examples.
>
> So I'm really hoping for two answers.
> 1. Can lwresd be used (somehow) or not
lwresd isn't a dns server. I suspect it's in the base system because
it comes bundled with bind, rather than because it's used itself, as
there's no hook to start it in /etc/rc or /etc/defaults.
> 2. What are the viable/best alternatives to #1 for a caching-only stub
> resolver (like nscd on linux)
dnsmasq is viable. May not be the best for your needs, but it works
great for me.
<mike
--
Mike Meyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.mired.org/consulting.html
Independent Network/Unix/Perforce consultant, email for more information.
O< ascii ribbon campaign - stop html mail - www.asciiribbon.org
_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
