On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 12:01:50PM -0700, Mark Foster wrote: > Mike Meyer wrote: > ... > I have no problem using dnsmasq if that is the best recommendation, in > fact I quite like it but am not fond of djbdns. > However lwresd *is* in the base install vs. dnsmasq which is a port, so > would like to use lwresd if possible (or something else in base like > cached). There is nothing I find in the man page, handbook or google > that says I shouldn't or can't use lwresd, only hints that I can, yet > with no clear working real-world examples. > > So I'm really hoping for two answers. > 1. Can lwresd be used (somehow) or not > 2. What are the viable/best alternatives to #1 for a caching-only stub > resolver (like nscd on linux)
Wrt #2, I was able to compile & install nscd from FreeBSD src, but only on systems running fairly modern releases -- IIRC no older than 6.2 . cheers, sr. _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
