* Paul Schenkeveld <fb-hack...@psconsult.nl> wrote: > Or change 'pts' to, for example, 'pt' so without changing utmp and > related stuff we'll have space for a four digit pty number.
I've noticed lots of apps already misbehave because of the pty(4) -> pts(4) migration. I guess using a new naming scheme would totally break stuff. There are lots of apps that do things like: if (strncmp(tty, "tty", 3) != 0 && strncmp(tty, "pts/", 4) != 0) printf("Not a valid pseudo-terminal!\n"); But those are just workarounds. Our utmp format is broken anyway. It's not just UT_LINESIZE that's too small. I think we received many complaints from people who want to increase UT_HOSTSIZE as well. -- Ed Schouten <e...@80386.nl> WWW: http://80386.nl/
pgpvuMfsX7ctx.pgp
Description: PGP signature