-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Ivan Voras wrote: > Hi, > > Are there still known problems with tmpfs? > > I've been using it for a while in 7-STABLE and 8-CURRENT without > noticeable problems - not that there was ever serious load involved > (normal /tmp activity). I've just tried it and it survived a couple of > rounds of blogbench, even with virtual memory swapping. > > In other words, is there still reason for the "highly experimental > feature" warning?
Last time when I added the warning, it was because some data corruption issue that can be identified by fsx which I didn't got a chance to investigate further. I think tmpfs is Ok for some usual work but maybe not ready for production at that moment. alc@ and kib@ has made a lot of changes on it recently so perhaps we need to re-visit the problems, tmpfs would be a great feature for us. Cheers, - -- Xin LI <delp...@delphij.net> http://www.delphij.net/ FreeBSD - The Power to Serve! -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.11 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAko2kw8ACgkQi+vbBBjt66D8LwCgiEevv8qy5pl/b73rDhXU6oso jr0AoLKo/WGvoLOU7HrivC8KK2yidKo+ =alk6 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-hackers-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
