"Shaowei Wang (wsw)" <[email protected]> writes: > So what's the direction? Are we going to cut off all the GNU compiler > tool chains and use the llvm/clang when it's mature.
Who's "we"? Anyway, LLVM *isn't* mature, and it probably won't be for years, if ever, so there's no point in asking. If it ever reaches a point where it covers our needs, and it's still under an acceptable license, and somebody sits down and does the work and assumes the responsibility, and portsmgr@ doesn't have a conniption because it breaks half the ports tree, and core@ approves, and a majority of developers approve, including those who think we should run with pcc instead but can't be arsed to do the work, then maybe. At this point, speculating about it is just a waste of time and electrons. DES -- Dag-Erling Smørgrav - [email protected] _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
