* Dag-Erling Smørgrav <[email protected]> wrote: > "Shaowei Wang (wsw)" <[email protected]> writes: > > So what's the direction? Are we going to cut off all the GNU compiler > > tool chains and use the llvm/clang when it's mature. > > Who's "we"? > > Anyway, LLVM *isn't* mature, and it probably won't be for years, if > ever, so there's no point in asking.
Even though "if ever" sounds a little bit pessimistic, I agree. Unfortunately I'm busy working on other things the last couple of weeks/months, but the biggest problem with LLVM/Clang right now is that the latest release on the website is practically useless to us. I've been tracking SVN, but each time I decide to upgrade sources, I get yet another regression, which means I have to file bug reports. I think I already filed 50-60 bug reports. For some reason there has been a lot of talking, but no hacking. It takes a lot of work to maintain ClangBSD, at least more than I'm willing to spend on it right now. -- Ed Schouten <[email protected]> WWW: http://80386.nl/
pgpEqIvO4wFjU.pgp
Description: PGP signature
