Ed Schouten escribió:
Hi Ulrich,
* Ulrich Spörlein <[email protected]> wrote:
Comments? Committers?
Wouldn't it better to address the root of the problem while there? ;-)
What I noticed is that the patch sets WARNS?=0 for a lot of utilities,
which actually have higher WARNS-compliance. Even if we don't "address
the root of the problem" right now, it would be nice to elaborate and
set each WARNS level at the higher value possible.For example,
usr.bin/ul is marked as 0 by the patch but it seems to me it is WARNS=6
clean. I don't know the last sources, though, but I'm sure it will
compile with at least WARNS=3.
--
Gabor Kovesdan
FreeBSD Volunteer
EMAIL: [email protected] .:|:. [email protected]
WEB: http://people.FreeBSD.org/~gabor .:|:. http://kovesdan.org
_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
