Dag-Erling Smørgrav escribió:
Gabor Kovesdan <[email protected]> writes:
What I noticed is that the patch sets WARNS?=0 for a lot of utilities,
which actually have higher WARNS-compliance.
WARNS level 0 is the current default. All Ulrich's patch does is
reverse the logic so that WARNS is 6 by default and anything that didn't
already set WARNS explicitly sets it to 0, so the actual value of WARNS
in each Makefile is the same as before. This is orthogonal to actually
fixing whatever doesn't currently build at a higher WARNS level.
Yep, I understand that but what I'm saying is that once we are dealing
with such a big patch, it would be nice to elaborate the highest WARNS
level of each utility and set them accordingly, which doesn't require
too much extra effort as opposed to making all of them WARNS=6 compliant.
--
Gabor Kovesdan
FreeBSD Volunteer
EMAIL: [email protected] .:|:. [email protected]
WEB: http://people.FreeBSD.org/~gabor .:|:. http://kovesdan.org
_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
