* John Baldwin <[email protected]> wrote: > Note that the spec doesn't cover MAP_ANON at all FWIW.
Yes. I've noticed Linux also uses MAP_ANONYMOUS instead of MAP_ANON. They do provide MAP_ANON for compatibility, if I remember correctly. -- Ed Schouten <[email protected]> WWW: http://80386.nl/
pgpxciIJov3Hf.pgp
Description: PGP signature
