Ed Schouten wrote:
* John Baldwin <[email protected]> wrote:
Note that the spec doesn't cover MAP_ANON at all FWIW.
Yes. I've noticed Linux also uses MAP_ANONYMOUS instead of MAP_ANON.
They do provide MAP_ANON for compatibility, if I remember correctly.
For what it's worth, I believe that Solaris does the exact opposite.
They provide MAP_ANONYMOUS for compatibility. It seems like a good idea
for us to do the same.
We also have an unimplemented option MAP_RENAME defined for
compatibility with "Sun" that is nowhere mentioned in modern Solaris
documentation.
Alan
_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
