Hi, > On 16 Feb 2017, at 11:20, Karl Denninger <[email protected]> wrote: > > I'm wondering what people think of a forward path for the following: > > > CPU: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5620 @ 2.40GHz (2400.14-MHz > K8-class CPU) > Origin="GenuineIntel" Id=0x206c2 Family=0x6 Model=0x2c Stepping=2 > > Features=0xbfebfbff<FPU,VME,DE,PSE,TSC,MSR,PAE,MCE,CX8,APIC,SEP,MTRR,PGE,MCA,CMOV,PAT,PSE36,CLFLUSH,DTS,ACPI,MMX,FXSR,SSE,SSE2,SS,HTT,TM,PBE> > > Features2=0x29ee3ff<SSE3,PCLMULQDQ,DTES64,MON,DS_CPL,VMX,SMX,EST,TM2,SSSE3,CX16,xTPR,PDCM,PCID,DCA,SSE4.1,SSE4.2,POPCNT,AESNI> > AMD Features=0x2c100800<SYSCALL,NX,Page1GB,RDTSCP,LM> > AMD Features2=0x1<LAHF> > VT-x: PAT,HLT,MTF,PAUSE,EPT,UG,VPID > TSC: P-state invariant, performance statistics > real memory = 25773998080 (24580 MB) > avail memory = 24915828736 (23761 MB) > Event timer "LAPIC" quality 600 > ACPI APIC Table: <111612 APIC1749> > FreeBSD/SMP: Multiprocessor System Detected: 16 CPUs > FreeBSD/SMP: 2 package(s) x 4 core(s) x 2 hardware threads > > The system board is a Supermicro and has embedded IPMI (which I require > for remote admin purposes) on a separate interface. It's plenty fast > but very power-hungry. > > I'm interested in other's experience with various system board options, > and processors, that will return /better /performance and which have a > good history running FreeBSD /but with lower power consumption. > > /Any suggestions welcome.
We’ve had good experiences with Intel’s own servers based on the S2600Gx m’boards but might be overkill for you. > -- > Karl Denninger > [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > /The Market Ticker/ > /[S/MIME encrypted email preferred]/ -- Bob Bishop [email protected] _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hardware To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
