On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 9:27 AM, Julian Elischer <[email protected]> wrote: > In the following example it appears that the mask bits for the port number > are lost. > before I raise a bug.. is there anyone who can see that I am doing anything > wrong? > > I'm not sure what the q131053 stuff is about either, but..
q131053 is the internal name for the queue associated with the pipe (pipe# + 0x10000). I am not sure if the mask supports ip/port notation (dst-ip covers only the address part). Of course the real bug is that the parser should be more strict and complain about extra/ignored fields. But the ipfw parser is full of these things. cheers luigi > ------------------------------------------ > FreeBSD fb10-cc03.kumo.com 10.3-RELEASE-p16 : Wed Feb 22 14:40:53 UTC 2017 > amd64 > > fb10-cc03# ipfw pipe 11 config mask dst-ip 0x000000ff/0x0fff bw 200Kbit/s > > fb10-cc03# ipfw pipe show > 00011: 200.000 Kbit/s 0 ms burst 0 > q131083 50 sl. 0 flows (1 buckets) sched 65547 weight 0 lmax 0 pri 0 > droptail > sched 65547 type FIFO flags 0x1 64 buckets 0 active > mask: 0x00 0x00000000/0x0000 -> 0x000000ff/0x0000 > -- -----------------------------------------+------------------------------- Prof. Luigi RIZZO, [email protected] . Dip. di Ing. dell'Informazione http://www.iet.unipi.it/~luigi/ . Universita` di Pisa TEL +39-050-2217533 . via Diotisalvi 2 Mobile +39-338-6809875 . 56122 PISA (Italy) -----------------------------------------+------------------------------- _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ipfw To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
