On 1/3/17 1:54 am, Julian Elischer wrote:
On 1/3/17 1:46 am, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 9:27 AM, Julian Elischer
<jul...@freebsd.org> wrote:
In the following example it appears that the mask bits for the
port number
are lost.
before I raise a bug.. is there anyone who can see that I am doing
anything
wrong?
I'm not sure what the q131053 stuff is about either, but..
q131053 is the internal name for the queue associated with the pipe
(pipe# + 0x10000).
I am not sure if the mask supports ip/port notation (dst-ip covers
only the address part).
Of course the real bug is that the parser should be more strict and
complain
about extra/ignored fields. But the ipfw parser is full of these
things.
cheers
luigi
my error is I should have used dst-port 0x000f not /0x000f
seems to be working now
------------------------------------------
FreeBSD fb10-cc03.kumo.com 10.3-RELEASE-p16 : Wed Feb 22 14:40:53
UTC 2017
amd64
fb10-cc03# ipfw pipe 11 config mask dst-ip 0x000000ff/0x0fff bw
200Kbit/s
fb10-cc03# ipfw pipe show
00011: 200.000 Kbit/s 0 ms burst 0
q131083 50 sl. 0 flows (1 buckets) sched 65547 weight 0 lmax 0 pri 0
droptail
sched 65547 type FIFO flags 0x1 64 buckets 0 active
mask: 0x00 0x00000000/0x0000 -> 0x000000ff/0x0000
btw ipfw pipe show
only shows queues currently active. is there a way to see 'queues
active in the last few seconds"?
_______________________________________________
freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ipfw
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ipfw-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
_______________________________________________
freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ipfw
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ipfw-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
