Hi A quick update on the update to mono5. In theory everything should be working (i.e. mono, monodevelop, etc).
A review has also been created (so you can access the patch). Please test it. https://reviews.freebsd.org/D12440 Regards On 25 August 2017 at 21:41, David Naylor <naylor.b.da...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tuesday, 15 August 2017 12:21:20 Romain Tartière wrote: > > Hi David, > > > > On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 09:11:57AM +0200, David Naylor wrote: > > > Here is an update on porting mono 5: > > > - mono: 5.1.0.1 (needs to be updated to 5.2, tests run) > > > - msbuild: 15.3 (needs tests ported and run, upstream bugs filed) > > > - fsharp: 4.1.25 (WIP) > > > - monodevelop: 7.0.1.24 (WIP) > > > - gtksharp20: 2.12.45 (WIP) > > > - avahi-sharp: 0.7 (not started) > > > - bumping all dependent ports (not started) > > > - exp-run (not started) > > > > > > Would anyone be interested in doing a (Phabricator) review? > > > > I don't actively use mono nowadays but sure, I can check if my old code > > tests suites still pass with the update. I have just registered to > > Phabricator and have no previous experience with this tool, so get ready > > to teach me stuff ;-) > > Great, thanks. > > Here is a status update (with patch [1][3]). Things aren't ready yet, but > as > it > stands: > - lang/mono: 5.2.0.215 (tests failing in mcs/class/corlib > [run-test-local]) > - devel/msbuild: 15.3 (tests failing [with SIGABRT]) > - lang/sharp: 4.1.25 (tests failing in math/measures/test.fsx [Invalid IL > code]) > - x11-toolkits/gtk-sharp20: 2.12.45 > - x11-toolkits/gnome-sharp20: 2.24.4 > WIP: > - devel/monodevelop: 7.1.0.1297 (full nuget package restore required > [extra > nuget support required]) > - devel/mono-addins: depreciate [2] (broken with mono5), fix dependencies > TODO: > - mono: test self hosting > - update mono-lite version > - avahi-sharp: 0.7 > - bump all dependent ports > - exp-run > - commit to ports > - upstream patches > - fix tests > > Note that the failing tests don't worry me too much. Most of them are edge > cases that won't affect the average user (i.e. not a blocker to commit to > ports) - also I don't know how many tests are failing on other platforms > (if > any). > > [1] git clone https://github.com/DragonSA/ports; cd ports; git diff > master..origin/mono5.2.0.215 > [2] A general discussion needs to be had around nuget packages. How do we > consume them? > i) as downloads with each port containing a copy > ii) local ports with consistency across the Ports Collections > iii) A mixture of the above (i.e. (ii) is there is a native component, > otherwise (i)) > I prefer (ii) as I think it gives the end user the best leverage to patch > issues with nuget packages locally (and to get updates without waiting on > a) > upstream, and b) us/ports maintainer). However, at this point that option > is > at 0% progress. > [3] https://people.freebsd.org/~dbn/mono-20170825.diff.xz _______________________________________________ freebsd-mono@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-mono To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-mono-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"